μsKerem Uysal
PHYS 101 · Lab Project

Comparing static friction on two surfaces

μs = tan θc

Same block, same loads, two different surfaces. Tilt the board slowly, record the angle where the block first slides, and the coefficient of static friction falls out of one tangent. The mass cancels, so changing the load should change nothing.

Kerem UysalBilkent University · Department of Physics
live · board tilts until the block slips
2
surfaces, A and B
3
total masses M1–M3
5
trials per condition
30
angle readings
Theory

Why one angle is all you need

As the board tilts, static friction grows to match the pull of gravity down the slope. It can only grow up to μsN. The angle where it runs out gives μs directly (Giancoli, §4–8).

Along the boardmg sin θ − fs = 0
PerpendicularN − mg cos θ = 0
Just before slipfs = μsN  at  θ = θc
Combinemg sin θc = μs mg cos θc
Resultμs = tan θc

The mass cancels. Move the mass slider on the right: both curves stretch, but the point where they cross stays put.

Force budget on the block

Holds
20.0°
0.40 kg
Needed—
Max static—
Crossing θc—
Ready · raise slowly
Board angle0.0°last θc: —
weight mg normal N friction f components of mg
Simulation

Tilt the board yourself

Grab the purple knob on the raised end, or use the slider. Raise slowly and use the 0.1° nudges near the sliding point, as in step 4 of the procedure. When the block slips, its angle goes onto the sheet. Lower the board to put the block back for the next trial.

Measurement sheet

Simulated
Trialθc (°)μs = tan θcObservation
Mean ± SD——
Results

Does mass matter?

Mean μs for each of the six conditions, with error bars of one sample standard deviation. A flat row of points means no mass dependence, which is what μs = tan θc predicts.

Mean μs vs total mass

AB

Summary · Appendix C

Simulated
Cond.nθ̄c (°)μ̄sSD

These numbers come from the simulation: typical friction values for each material plus random trial-to-trial scatter. They show how the analysis works. They are not lab data.

Uncertainty

What does one degree cost?

An angle reading of θ ± Δθ puts μs between tan(θ − Δθ) and tan(θ + Δθ). The same Δθ costs more on a grippy surface, because tan θ gets steeper as θ grows.

30.0°
±1.0°
μ low—
μ = tan θ—
μ high—

The project's own example, 30° ± 1°, gives a coefficient between tan 29° and tan 31°. Drag the reading to 45° with the same ±1° and the band gets noticeably taller.

Δμs ≈ sec²θ · Δθ

Here Δθ is in radians. At 30°, sec²θ is about 1.33; at 45° it is 2. This is why the analysis compares the spread of repeated trials with the spread that the angle device alone would cause: if two surfaces or two masses differ by less than both, the difference means nothing.

Relative uncertainty here: —

Method

Procedure

Board about 0.5–1.0 m long, a short wide block with extra weights near its centre, two surface materials, a balance, and a protractor or calibrated inclinometer.

  1. Prepare surface A

    Record the material, check it lies flat on the board, and mark the starting position.

  2. Weigh the masses

    Weigh the block alone and with its added loads. Record M1, M2 and M3 and keep the same totals on both surfaces.

  3. Zero the angle device

    Zero it on a horizontal reference. A phone used as an inclinometer stays clear of the sliding path.

  4. Raise the board slowly

    Start M1 at the mark. Lift without pushing the block, and use only small angle changes near the sliding point.

  5. Read θc

    Record the angle at the first continuous slide. A brief jump does not count.

  6. Repeat five times

    Reset and repeat for five readings, then do M2 and M3 with the same contact face and orientation.

  7. Switch to surface B

    Record the new material and repeat all fifteen measurements with the same block, masses and method.

  8. Note anything odd

    Toppling, a moving surface sheet, or any unexpected result goes in the observations column.